Upcoming Provincial Election
I feel the contents of this article are worth reflecting on:
A MESSAGE TO VOTERS IN 
A  provincial election will be held in 
As  important as is the election determining who will run the province for another  four years, perhaps the referendum question is of even greater importance  because of its long lasting impact on both democracy and the pro-life/pro-family  cause.
The  referendum question will ask: which electoral system should 
The existing electoral system (first  past the post) i.e. the party which receives a simple majority forms the  government, or
An alternative electoral system,  called the Mixed Member Proportional Vote (MMP).
The  MMP system is used in 
It  is the proposed MMP procedure that causes us grave concern because if  implemented it will not only undermine the democratic process, but will also  negatively impact the pro-life/pro-family cause.
What is the Mixed  Member Proportional Vote?
This voting system will produce two  classes of politicians: those elected by the voters (90 MPP's) and those  appointed by the political parties (39 MPP's). That is the 129 seats in the  
The  political partys' lists are expected to alternate male and female candidates and  provide a "balance" based on such attributes as gender, ethnicity, religion,  sexual orientation, etc. As a result, even though there may be a superficial  diversity such as in appearance, i.e. gender or colour, creed, etc., among the  appointed MPP's, there will be no diversity in regard to the political views of  these appointees.
The  MMP system is the dream of the small parties, which is why the NDP and Green  parties are pushing it. Any party with 3% of the popular vote will get a chance  to be part of a coalition with the larger parties. Not surprisingly, the MMP  system usually leads to more political parties. For example, before MMP was  introduced, 
In  the MMP system, political elections are usually followed by weeks of closed-door  deal making among parties to form a government - exactly the reverse of what  happens after the first past the post elections, where the results are  immediately announced.
A result of this secret deal making  is that it creates unstable coalitions to form a minority government -  inevitable with this voting system, often with a brief shelf life. The latter is  one of the reasons why 
The greatest beneficiaries of MMP,  apart from the small parties, will be feminists, homosexuals and other special  interest groups, as the major parties will certainly place them at the top of  their list for appointments to the legislature. For example, parties constantly  bemoan the lack of women in the legislature. However, it is not the gender of a  candidate that matters to the voters, but rather, his/her perspective on issues.  Feminists, as part of a special interest group, have worked long and hard for  the introduction of the MMP voting system, knowing that it will strengthen their  voice in government since they will be assured of appointments to the  legislature by the major parties. The MMP system neatly by-passes the  inconvenient fact that voters base their votes on the candidate's views and  platform, rather than on gender.
Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty has  stated that in order for the referendum to pass, it must have 60% approval from  the votes cast. Therefore, it is very important to the pro-life/pro-family cause  that the referendum NOT receive the required 60% approval  rate.
[Source: "REALily"  - a publication  of 'REAL Women of Canada'  (www. realwomenca.com) ..... an excellent  conservative pro-family organization.]

